Internal Audit Procedure Template| ISO 42001 AIMS
Through the Internal Audit Procedure the AI Management System (AIMS) achieves its effectiveness along with adequate performance while seeking continuous enhancement according to ISO 42001 standards.

Scope of Internal Audit Procedure Template
The internal audit procedure of ISO 42001 evaluates all components of the AI Management System (AIMS) alongside their governance structure alongside ethical guidelines and regulatory necessities. The assessment encompasses all elements and requirements along with other relevant factors.
- Assessment of AI governance policies, roles, and responsibilities.
- Verification of AI model accountability mechanisms.
- The assessment covers AI risk management aspects that include security evaluations as well as bias detection techniques and impact assessment methodology.
- Review of compliance with regulatory frameworks (GDPR, ISO 42001 Clause 6.3, AI Act, etc.).
Responsibilities
-
Members of the Organization: The AI Compliance Officer upholds governance policies through documenting and delivering necessary records while helping with audits. The Audit Secretary/Coordinator maintains the audit schedule and accessibility of audit documents while developing the audit calendar. Several roles participate in auditing through their cooperation with auditors to deliver system logs alongside model documentation along with compliance reports. The combined effort of the Secretary with organization Members will provide essential information which allows internal auditors to carry out comprehensive effective audits.
-
Director Auditing and Inspection: The internal audit process for AI Governance receives oversight from this individuals who ensure it meets requirements of ISO 42001. Strategy implementation requires an AI internal audit program to assess AI-related risks besides conducting bias evaluation and handling ethical considerations. Reports audit findings to executive leadership, the AI Ethics Committee, and compliance teams.
-
Internal Audit Team Leader: The leader of the Internal Audit team in an AIMS is accountable for the following aspects of implementing the internal audit procedure:
- Maintains and supervisees the AI governance audit program.
-
To ensure fairness, transparency, and compliance with ISO 42001 standards through risk-based AI audits.
-
Examines audit findings on AI discrimination, its suitability for explanation and compliance with regulatory regulations.
-
Informs senior management about AI governance performance and risk mitigation.
- Information for evaluating the performance of top management is also the responsibility of the head of the Internal audit team. The task can be outsourced to someone, but it should not be a part of the internal audit team's responsibility.

Internal Audit Procedure.
1. Establish Audit Objectives: Explain the goals of the internal audit, which may involve investigating the quality of AI governance controls, verifying compliance with ISO 42001 standards, identifying areas for improvement, and evaluating the overall performance, fairness, transparency, etc. of artificial intelligence systems. Establish AI ethics, accountability, risk management, and bias mitigation as the audit objectives meet ISO 42001 standards.
2. Plan the Audit: Establish a comprehensive assessment of AI, taking into account:
-
Including scope audits related to AI lifecycle stages, model transparency and accountability.
-
The audit criteria, including the ISO 42001 clauses, AI governance policies, and risk management frameworks.
-
Audit techniques, such as document review, model testing, stakeholder interviews and evaluations of system performance. All are considered.
- Personnel in demand (AI governance specialists, compliance officers, technical auditors).
- To check the timeline for AI system updates and risk factors.
3. Select Audit Team: Build an efficient and unbiased independent audit panel that has knowledge in AI governance, risk assessment/risk reduction (RMG), compliance, and ethical standards. Give out tasks and obligations, such as. Oversees the audit activities related to AI. Technical Auditor – Evaluates the effectiveness, security measures and potential biases of AI models. Compliance Auditor – Ensuring compliance with ISO 42001 and legal frameworks.
4. Conduct Audit Opening Meeting:
To begin the audit, a preliminary meeting must be held with key stakeholders to:
- AI Governance Committee.
- AI Model Owners.
2. Perform Audit Activities: Conduct a systematic review of AI governance practices by:
- Reviewing AI policies, risk assessments and compliance reports.
- To the fairness, transparency and avoiding bias of AI models.
-
Key personnel will be interviewed to verify the legitimacy of governance practices.
3. Document Findings: Record audit findings, including:
- Negative practices (such as incomplete model documentation and bias correction).
- Observations (areas that require attention but are not in breach).
- Strengths are best practices for AI governance
- Opportunities for progress (recommendations for governance enhancements).
4. Communicate Audit Findings:
- A final meeting is held with auditees to share their findings.
- Recognized irregularities and their influence on AI management.
- Modifications that could be made to improve upon (e.g, reducing bias, improving explainability).
- Stakeholder concerns and clarifications.
5. Prepare an Audit Report: Obtain an AI audit report that covers everything. Specific outcomes – Inconsistencies, risks, and recommended procedures.
6. Monitor Corrective Actions: Attempt to implement corrective measures against non-conformities. Within a specific timeframe, establish if it is feasible to test the efficacy of these actions.
7. Conduct Follow-up Audits:
- Validate corrective action effectiveness.
- Maintain the advancement of AI governance.
- Relieve residual risks associated with AI ethics and accountability.
Conclusion
The audit plan becomes operational through the Internal Audit Procedure which specifies steps for AI governance control evaluation while also enabling finding documentation and corrective action generation. The procedure plays an essential role in upholding transparency and maintaining accountabilities while conforming to ISO 42001 standards which supports the organization’s dedication to AI management responsibilities.